Rusty Iron Ring wrote:
Hunter S Thompson wrote:

f.  I don't think that tax dollars should be used to fund election campaigns.  I don't agree with the $2 per vote rule, or whatever it is.

I take it then that you're also against the conservatives' spending $20million to advertise the economic action plan and changing the name of the government, and would expect them to also eliminate tax credits for party donations.

Considering the government subsidizes you for political party donations to the tune of 75%, I've always wondered why the per vote subsidy is so objectionable. Why is it more objectionable to subsidize on the basis of the number of voters you attract than on the number of dollars you attract?