There's absolutely nothing wrong with my characterization of what happened. The Cons claimed U of G was running an advance poll. That was patently false. Guelph, along with many other Canadian universities, was running a special ballot for students, which is not at all the same thing.

Elections Canada concluded: "A special ballot coordinator, appointed by the local returning officer, oversaw the activities at the University of Guelph. All information at our disposal indicates that the votes were cast in a manner that respects the Canada Elections Act and are valid."

In other words, shove up your petty and false complaint up your briefs. But I don't expect that will deter the Cons from another costly court challenge to the Supreme Court.