JP, I have to disagree with you, Ezra would make a fine appointment to the SCC. Other than Conrad Black, who else has such intimate knowledge of the law of defamation. Unfortunately for Ezra, most of his knowledge was aquired at considerable cost to himself. After apologizing and paying undisclosed damages to Con Senator Ron Ghitter, Ezra again had to dig deep when successfully sued by Giacomo Vigna. Naturally, after paying out like that, you'd expect a man to be a bit more circumspect in what he said. But not our man Ezra. He's currently being sued for defamation by Richard Warman and Warren Kinsella, and was lucky to dodge a bullet after making some wild accusations of Nazi collaboration against George Soros.

I believe Ezra would also bring a new perspective on administrative law and professional liability to the court. The Law Society of Alberta found that Ezra violated the following rules of professional conduct: to “respect and uphold the law in personal conduct,” to “seek to improve the justice system,” to not “ act in a manner that might weaken public respect for the law,” to be “courteous and candid,” and to not “harass any person or discriminate against any person” on various prohibited grounds and ordered Levant to attend a "mandatory conduct advisory".

In short, he'd be just the cat for Stevie to set among the pigeons.