ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 1487
Jan 22 10 12:58 PM
Rusty Iron Ring wrote: Hunter S Thompson wrote: bumblebee wrote: This has nothing to do with any specific incident whatsoever and is just a general question. I'm assuming (having not read it) the "difference" in the Advice Scene Judge's book is that he is writing it for the general public. In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with this, and it's likely even a positive development, especially in the area of family law where (as I understand it), people are often quite content to represent themselves. I think you mean "the difference in the general hypothetical question having nothing to do with any specific incident whatsoever". It's ok. I also occasionally mis-type a word or two when I am perusing multiple legal websites to participate in democratizing the law. I think it's called a Freudian lawsuit. I mean slip.
Hunter S Thompson wrote: bumblebee wrote: This has nothing to do with any specific incident whatsoever and is just a general question. I'm assuming (having not read it) the "difference" in the Advice Scene Judge's book is that he is writing it for the general public. In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with this, and it's likely even a positive development, especially in the area of family law where (as I understand it), people are often quite content to represent themselves.
bumblebee wrote: This has nothing to do with any specific incident whatsoever and is just a general question.
This has nothing to do with any specific incident whatsoever and is just a general question.
I'm assuming (having not read it) the "difference" in the Advice Scene Judge's book is that he is writing it for the general public. In my opinion, there's nothing wrong with this, and it's likely even a positive development, especially in the area of family law where (as I understand it), people are often quite content to represent themselves.
Interact
Share This