ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 74
Jan 21 10 8:13 PM
Wobblie wrote: Voting along partisan lines the US Supreme Court today struck down a 100-year-old law banning direct corporate election spending, allowing corporations to spend as much as they want to elect or defeat candidates for Congress and the White House. The ruling has been condemned by members of both parties. Can we officially call it fascism now? Citizens United v. FEC opinion.
Interact
Posts: 2484
Jan 21 10 8:40 PM
Posts: 12
Jan 26 10 6:31 AM
Posts: 1003
Jan 26 10 7:09 AM
Jan 26 10 7:25 AM
Posts: 898
Posts: 4344
Jan 26 10 7:33 AM
Jan 26 10 8:02 AM
jaggers wrote: You should be outraged at this activist court's disregard for the legislature and the principle of stare decisis.
Posts: 1397
Jan 26 10 10:19 AM
Jan 26 10 10:45 AM
Jan 27 10 5:13 AM
Regulus de Leo wrote: A reasonable limit would be for unions and corporations to disclose who is funding the ads. That would be perfectly acceptable. The American public can judge for themselves if they want to agree with the subject matter of the advertisement.
Jan 27 10 6:23 AM
Jan 27 10 6:24 AM
Jan 27 10 6:35 AM
Jan 27 10 7:40 AM
Regulus de Leo wrote: Americans are sophisticated enough to follow the 'paid for by' part of the ads.
Jan 27 10 7:56 AM
Jan 27 10 11:39 AM
Jan 27 10 12:10 PM
Regulus de Leo wrote:The Townhall meetings were terrific non-violent (except for Obama's bused in union thugs) expressions of grassroots feelings. Americans understood exactly what Obama was up to. And let's hope that Obamacare is dead.
Jan 27 10 12:47 PM
Jan 27 10 1:25 PM
Share This